From graduating University, leaving home, finding a partner, having kids, to becoming financially independent, we 20-somethings seem to be doing everything a little later in life than the previous generation. So it makes sense that retirement might also happen later as well.
By the time my mom was 29, she was married with 2 kids – and a homeowner by age 24. Meanwhile at age 29, I feel like I can barely take care of myself. :|
Even though retirement might seem a long ways off, 20-somethings are in the best position to begin saving for retirement. The more money you can save today, means the more money you will have in the future. Yet, it seems like very few of us are putting enough money into our RRSPs, or even thinking about retirement at all.
Retirement as we know it today is based on the idea that you work for the majority of your life, until you have accumulated enough money to quit your job and live off of your savings – typically in your mid-60’s. But what will retirement look like in 30-40 years when we’re ready to retire? And will the traditional method of saving our income until our 60’s lead to a comfortable retirement – or will we fall short?
Here are some reasons why 20-somethings might face difficulties staying on track with a retirement plan:
More debt upon graduation
According to the Canadian Council on Learning, the average tuition for a university undergraduate in 1990 was $1,464. But by 2010, that number had more than tripled to an average of $4,917. As a result of the increase in tuition, graduates who completed their programs in 2000 owed 68 per cent more than students who graduated in 1990.
The average debt load of university graduates in 2009 was $26,680 – which doesn’t include credit cards, lines of credit, car loans, or mortgages. And with a shortage of job opportunities for new graduates, it is easy to see why it can be hard for 20-somethings to begin their journey towards financial independence.
Higher cost of living
In most of Canada’s major cities, the age-old principle of purchasing a home no more than 2-3x your gross annual salary is not realistic. A January 2011 study done by the Frontier Centre for Public Policy showed that the median Vancouver home at $602,000 was 9.5 times the $63,100 median household income in the city. Meanwhile, the median Toronto home at $379,000 was sitting at 5.1 times the $74,800 median household income.
It’s not just housing that’s more expensive in comparison. It’s everything from the cost of fuel, to movie tickets, to groceries and clothing.
Not only do students have more debt upon graduation, and a higher cost of living, there are also other expenses that other generations didn’t have – such as cell phones, personal computers and internet access – all of which is considered essential in order to be competitive in today’s job market.
Less employers offering pensions & benefits
Many companies have stopped offering traditional pensions or medical benefits to new hires, or have significantly cut back on the plans that they offer. Since I entered the workforce six years ago, I have only worked for one company that offered an RRSP plan with a company match (four per cent).
I have also been employed by companies that don’t offer a health benefits plan at all. Which means that everything from a visit to the dentist, to getting a prescription filled came out of my pocket.
Previous to 1992, the opportunity to borrow money penalty-free from your RRSPs was not an option. With the introduction of the Home Buyers’ Plan in 1992, an estimated two million people have borrowed more than $15 billion of their own RRSP savings to purchase a home.
The Lifelong Learning Plan, which was introduced in 1999, has seen an estimated 50,000 people borrow approximately $363 million since its inception.
While these programs are “penalty-free” as long as you repay the money back into RRSPs within 15 years, borrowers will end up losing tens of thousands of dollars in potential tax-deferred growth if they take the entire 15 year period.
More opportunities & accessibility
The world is much more accessible than it once was. Many young adults are finding opportunities abroad that just weren’t widely available 10 or 20 years ago, such as teaching English abroad, volunteering in third-world countries, or spending a year traveling. These opportunities tend to mean that 20-somethings will take that much longer graduating from university, getting into the work force, and finding their way out of debt.
Travel and exploration aside, 20 years ago, there weren’t iPads, smart phones, flat screen TVs, video game consoles, or DVD movies to buy – not that you need to buy any of those items, but they are there. What’s more, with the internet, we don’t even need to leave the comfort of our own home to buy anything. Late at night, or on a rainy day, with a click of a mouse, we can buy whatever we want – which does nothing to curb impulse shopping.
Longer life expectancy
It’s no surprise that we are living longer than ever. In 1970, the average life expectancy of a person Canada was 72.7 years. In 2009, that number jumped to 81.2 years on average. While that might not seem like a lot, it means a lot more savings is needed in order to finance almost 10 more years of life expectancy. And of course, those are just averages. There is a significant possibility that the 20-somethings of today will live well into their 90’s and beyond.
Do you think the retirement at 65 is out of reach for today’s 20-somethings?
Just a quick post today – I saw this infographic over at the LifeTurner website and thought it really illustrates the benefits of saving for retirement as soon as you can.
I didn’t start saving for retirement until I was 24, and even though some might still say that was an early age to start (I had just graduated from college), I remember thinking that I should have started sooner.
At what age did you start saving for retirement?
Now that I’ve had a few days to go over the recommendations put forth by the financial advisor, I can share with you what he has told me about my investment portfolio. Please read my previous post, “Financial advisors: do you have one?” or my two posts on Moneyville about my experience with my financial advisor: “Why I decided I needed a financial advisor” and “How I heading for Freedom 55.”
First, here’s a background of what I’m invested in:
Holdings in TD Mutual Funds (mostly e-series): CDN Money Market, Canadian Index-e, U.S. Index-e, European Index-e, Japanese Index-e, CDN Bond Index-e, International Index-e, TD Dividend Growth.
- Asset allocation
- 91.7% stocks
- 2.7% bonds
- 5.6% cash
- Geographic allocation
- 51.6% Canada
- 24% U.S.
- 24.4% International
I learned that while my geographic allocation is good, my asset allocation is too risky. The financial advisor recommended rebalancing to 70% stocks and 30% bond funds, and advised that my portfolio is over-diversified. For example, the allocations contained in both the European and Japanese index-e funds are contained within the International index-e fund.
He also called me out on investing in the Dividend Growth fund, which is boasting a lame 2.03% MER. :) I always meant to take care of that, but you know. Things happen. That was the original fund I held when I first opened up my mutual funds and hadn’t yet invested in the e-series funds. And as for the CDN Money Market fund, that was a left-over “placeholder” fund for when I was taking out my money for the Home Buyer’s Plan. I meant to re-distribute back into the e-series funds, but had problems because my investor profile wasn’t in sync with what I wanted to invest in. Then I got frustrated, and just left it.
The financial advisor told me that I should simply my portfolio from 8 mutual funds down to just 4, and suggested this allocation:
- 20% Canadian Index-e
- 25% U.S. Index-e
- 25% International Index-e
- 30% CDN Bond Index-e
Based on my $80,000 projected income this year, I’m saving 13% of my gross annual income into my Retirement Portfolio (which is around $400 bi-weekly broken down into $300 RRSP/$100 TFSA). The financial advisor told me that if I really want to retire by the age of 55, I will probably need to start saving more aggressively. He suggested I might need to go higher than 20% of my gross annual income. I already knew I wasn’t saving enough, but hearing it from somebody else is still a little disheartening. I’m already almost 30 (maybe), and my goal retirement age is only 25 years away.
As soon as I max out my Emergency Fund at $10,000 (I’m at around $7,000 right now), I will funnel that cash ($100 bi-weekly) into my Retirement Portfolio. That will bring me to around 16%, which isn’t ideal, but it’s a good first step. Once I’m there, I’ll figure out my next move.